منابع مشابه
Arguments Using Ontological and Causal Knowledge
We explore an approach to reasoning about causes via argumentation. We consider a causal model for a physical system, and we look for arguments about facts. Some arguments are meant to provide explanations of facts whereas some challenge these explanations and so on. At the root of argumentation here, are causal links ({A1, · · · , An} causes B) and also ontological links (c1 is a c2). We intro...
متن کاملAssessing the Overall Sufficiency of Safety Arguments
Safety cases offer a means for communicating information about the system safety among the system stakeholders. Recently, the requirement for a safety case has been considered by regulators for safety-critical systems. Adopting safety cases is necessarily dependent on the value added for regulatory authorities. In this work, we outline a structured approach for assessing the level of sufficienc...
متن کاملontological arguments of mental existence in islamic philosophy: a critical examination
from avicenna's era up to now, various arguments have been presented for the mental existence (al-wujud al-zihni), the most important of which are ten. these arguments don't have the same purpose: some of them are used only to reject the theory of relation (al-idafah), and some engage to refute the theory of phantoms (al-ashbah). considering critically the ten arguments, this article ...
متن کاملAssessing common(s) arguments for an equal per capita allocation
Emissions rights are commodities and many hold that these commodities (or alternatively the revenue from their auction) should be allocated to (adult) individuals on an equal per capita basis. Proponents of this equal per capita allocation (EPCA) often argue for it on the grounds that the atmosphere or greenhouse gas emissions sinks are a “commons”. But how can we assess the strength of these “...
متن کاملAssessing Weight of Opinion by Aggregating Coalitions of Arguments
Argument mining promises to be able to extract information from unstructured text that can help us to understand that text. This paper suggests a novel way to use such information once it has been extracted. Attack and support relations between arguments from a set of test texts are identified, the strength of the arguments is computed based on the relations, and arguments are grouped into coal...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1689-8311
DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.294